Alex Jones sues before the committee’s January 6 subpoena

Alex Jones appears in a frozen frame extracted from a deposition video. The recording was posted to YouTube by online news site HuffPost.

Alex Jones appears in a frozen frame extracted from a deposition video. The recording was posted to YouTube by online news site HuffPost.

InfoWars . Server Alex Jones sued the Commission on 6 January and several of the politicians involved. The lawsuit is an attempt to fight Jones’ removal that has been delayed since the lawsuit indicated that was originally scheduled for December 18.

“Jones has offered to submit documents and respond to written inquiries with a written response,” the lawsuit states. “The Selection Committee refused to accept that offer and confirmed that he would appear in person to be removed from office in Washington, DC on January 10, 2022. Jones notified the Selection Committee. that he intends to plead for his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. . ”

In the case, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Jones alleges the defendants initiated “coercive secret procedures specifically designed to satirize a suit hunt.” political hydrology”. He also said that the government is trying to “bypass constitutional safeguards” and “snap the role of the Executive Branch while threatening criminal prosecution against anyone who dares to assert their rights and freedoms.” by its own against the demands of the government.”

Elsewhere, the petition alleges that “House Democrats have repeatedly victimized themselves in a tragedy.” It asserted that the purpose of the Commission was only “revenge Donald Trump and his political allies “and claimed the Democrats hatched a plot of revenge” while huddled in the safe room of Congress” on January 6.

“[T]This person has clearly contemplated criminal charges against Donald Trump and his allies regardless of whether or not they have grounds for them,” the lawsuit alleges Democrats.

In the lawsuit, Jones describes himself as a “controversial American journalist, political commentator, activist, and businessman.” He described the January 6 Committee as “a congressional committee ostensibly organized and operated according to the Rules of the United States House of Representatives”. He called Representative. Elizabeth L. Cheney, one of the defendants was named, “purportedly a Republican” — an assertion the lawsuit sheds light on elsewhere:

One question exists as to whether Defendant Cheney is still a member of the Republican Party. The Wyoming Republican Party expelled her as a member, and President Thompson’s appointment of her to the Vice Chair position confirms by House Rules that she is a Democrat because of the House Rules. House rule XI(2)(d) provides that it is not appropriate. The seat must be a member of the majority party.

The lawsuit further alleges that “questions” of voter fraud following the November 2020 presidential election “were all equally motivated by the mass-mail ballot presidential election.” Firstly”. It complains that “Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi appointed only 9 members to the Selection Committee” despite having been authorized to appoint 13 members. The lawsuit explains:

Speaker Pelosi’s actions are contrary to the requirements of H. Res. 503 and the longstanding practices of the House. Minority leader Kevin McCarthy recommended five Republicans to serve on the Selection Committee, H. Res. 503: Representative Jim Banks of Indiana, Rep. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Rep. Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota, and Rep. Troy Nehls of Texas. He designated Representative Banks as the ranking minority member of the Republican Party.

Speaker Pelosi did not appoint any of the recommendations of Leader McCarthy. In a public statement on 21 July 2021, she stated that objections were made to the Representative Banks and Jordan and the fact that their presence on the Selection Committee could affect the “integrity of the investigation”. Instead, she expressed a willingness to appoint Representatives Davis, Armstrong, and Nehls, and she asked him to introduce two additional members. She described her decision as “unprecedented.”

The lawsuit further claims that the rules require the Commission to give three days’ notice to a ranked minority member prior to removal. Since there are no ranking minority members, the lawsuit argues that any removals sought and taken by the Commission violate the rules.

It went on to allege that the January 6 Commission was primarily empowered to pursue criminal prosecutions – an alleged violation of the constitutional powers of the executive branch.

The Selection Committee does not intend to prepare reports for the purposes of future legislation, nor does it have any authority to recommend and report legislation to the full House of Commons.

The Selection Committee and its members consider themselves and most other members of Congress to be victims of domestic terrorism. They also consider a minority of congressmen and senators as well as Donald Trump to be domestic terrorists.

The Selection Committee and its members intend to investigate “a domestic terrorist attack,” and the members of the Selection Committee have scattered the public record with comments suggesting that they were work primarily to expose matters for the sole purpose of exposing them and to secure individual decisions of guilt or innocence – a legal action designated by law enforcement. II and judicial authorities Article III.

The lawsuit says Jones plans to invoke his “First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights” to “refuse to produce” the full range of documents requested by the Commission. The filing asserts that Jones “engaged in constitutionally protected First Amendment political and journalistic activity, that the Fourth Amendment guaranteed him privacy in his papers.” himself and him have the right to due process and the right to remain silent under the Fifth Amendment. ”

The lawsuit then claims that the Commission “requested virtually every phone call and text Jones made during the requested period and data related to those phone calls and messages.” passed a subpoena to AT&T.

Jones “seriously considers” cooperating with the Commission, the lawsuit claims, but then suggests that Jones refused because “members of the Commission have made it clear that they are only interested in prosecuting adversaries.” politics”.

The lawsuit alleges that the Commission’s attempt to obtain the document and the removal of Jones violated Articles I, §§ 1, 8 of the United States Constitution, Separation of Powers, First Amendment, First Amendment fourth, Fifth Amendment, Archived Communications Act 18 USC § 2702 (for AT&T records). The lawsuit seeks a series of rulings claiming that would generally impede the Commission’s work, including the ruling that the Commission “was not a legally constituted commission and its actions until now have absolutely no legal authority.” It also searches for “[a]n restraining order Defendant imposes sanctions”, an order rescinding the subpoena against Jones, and at the junction prohibiting sanctions against AT&T. Finally, Jones sought attorneys’ fees and fees.

Jones is represented by New Haven attorney, Conn. Norm Pattis and Cameron Atkinson.

Read the 29-page petition and cache of related exhibits below:

Is there a trick we should know? [email protected] Alex Jones sues before the committee’s January 6 subpoena

Ian Walker is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button