Despite sharing a surname, George Puscas is not related to Ferenc Puskas.
There is no evidence that he is related to one of the “greatest players of all time”. So far, nothing has established his relationship with Ferenc Puskas.
The social media outrage began in April 2015 when a Twitter user posted a tweet. The user posted two photos, one of George and one of Ferenc, with the caption: “George Puscas, 18, is the name of a footballer. I believe there is no relation to Ferenc.”
After that, it attracted a lot of attention as many football fans wanted to know if the young player is descended from a legendary football player. Although the Romanian striker raised the issue a few times during his interviews, he never explicitly denied that there might be a connection.
Whenever a member of the press approaches him about his relationship with Ferenc, he explains that he doesn’t like being associated with him and that their shared last name has nothing to do with their relationship. He once said: “To be perfectly honest, I’m Romanian and I have nothing to do with his last name. I do things my way. I will play Puscas in Romanian.”
Are puscas and puskas the same?
Some may argue that they are not related because their last names are not the same. Although they have the same pronunciation, their spelling is different. You are indeed partially correct. How can George’s last name have the letter “C” in the middle and Ferenc’s last name has the letter “K” in the middle?
Although born in Romania, George is of half-Hungarian descent, and his surname Puscas derives from the Hungarian Puskas, making it similar to Ferenc Puskas.
https://www.soundhealthandlastingwealth.com/uncategorized/george-puskas-father/ Who is George Puska’s father? Parents and is he related to Ferenc Puskas?